Skip navigation.

navigation

Search: Amy Sherman

Results 1 - 15 of 21

Results

PUBLIC/PRIVATE RESOURCE

Staying In School: How Two Faith-Based Initiatives in Phoenix Are Keeping High-Risk Teens on the Path to Success

 

By Amy L. Sherman (Sagamore Institute Faith in Communities, 2004)

 

Sunny Phoenix is the site of two successful faith-based initiatives encouraging school retention by high-risk Hispanic and Native American youth. Neighborhood Ministries operates the “I Can Do It” program, an impressive, multi-faceted partnership with over 30 public schools. New Beginnings Church has launched its own charter high school, James Sandoval Prep, offering a “family-feel” small school that is succeeding with kids tossed out of traditional public schools.

 

This in-depth case study describes the background and development of these programs, the challenges they have faced, and the lessons learned.

 





 


-->
News
Conference Calendar
Forum
Find Others
Ask a Specialist

 

Handshake II (oooh.oooh, Flickr)Amy Sherman provides 5 principles for successful collaboration between government granting agencies and faith-based organizations (FBOs): ground-floor-up involvement, discerning teachability, sympathetic respect, connected autonomy, and strategic internal organization.

FBO - GOVERNMENT COLLABORATION RESOURCE  


Five Keys to Successful Government-Faith Collaboration

(Amy L. Sherman, Hudson Institute, 2004)

Partnerships between government entities and faith-based organizations (FBOs) delivering social services are becoming more common. Many of the collaborations involve FBOs with no previous history of formal, financial relationships with public agencies. For example, a 2002 study of nearly 400 faith-based contractors in 15 states by the Hudson Institute’s Faith in Communities project found that 56 percent of these leaders had only begun contracting with government since the passage of the charitable choice guidelines.[1] Nonetheless, a remarkable 92 percent reported that their experience with government was “positive” or “very positive” and that they would be willing to hold a government contract again in the future.[2]

Many FBOs, in short, have learned how to craft healthy partnerships with government agencies.

The effective collaborations I have witnessed are marked by several common characteristics. Not every collaboration may include every one of these elements, but the five listed below appear to be key stepping stones for workable, positive cooperation.

(1) Ground-floor-up involvement: This first is “ground-floor-up-involvement.” This describes a collaboration that is mutually designed by the government agency and the FBO. Together they craft the contours of their partnership, rather than that government agency imposing a pre-designed program upon the faith community.

(2) Discerning teachability: Second, it is important for the faith partner to display a respectful and teachable attitude toward the government partner. FBO leaders may well be critical of the ways of the “old welfare system.” And, agreement exists across the board that the old system was deficient in numerous respects; hence the fundamental reforms of 1996. But the FBO must avoid a smug attitude that secretly thinks: “Government has certainly made a lot of mistakes in the past. It’s a good thing they are finally looking to the faith community to supply them with some better answers.” The plain reality that many of the government’s ways under the old welfare system did not work does not mean that government officials and case managers are bereft of good ideas, compassion, or wisdom. Many public officials and caseworkers have a wealth of experience and keen insights about working with low-income families—wisdom and experience from which faith community leaders can learn. FBOs should be humble and teachable.

But this posture needs to be one of discerning teachability. This is because, in some instances, the worldviews of the government officials and the faith leaders will be different. Specific case managers may or may not hold the same presuppositions or values as do the staff or leaders of the FBO. These differences should be acknowledged and talked through candidly.

(3) Sympathetic respect: For their part, government officials must eschew an elitist perspective that holds that only highly educated professionals are equipped to help poor people. Instead, agency staff should acknowledge that lay volunteers can provide crucial emotional support and moral guidance to needy families—things that government, by its nature, does not offer well. The government partner should allow FBO service deliverers the flexibility and creativity to meet the needs of the families they are serving under the government contract, even when ministries rely on strategies remarkably different from those employed by government agencies.

(4) Connected Autonomy: In most current FBO-government relationships, the FBO is willing to do a lot, but does not want full responsibility for the disadvantaged families it is assisting. FBOs want assurances that the individuals they serve will also be linked to government-sponsored programs that address needs the FBOs themselves cannot meet. At the same time, FBOs want to help poor people without excessive governmental interference that would totally squelch the spiritual character of their outreach. FBOs want, in short, “connected autonomy.” That is, they want to be a part of a team that surrounds the family in need—a team on which they play a significant, largely unfettered, and unique role—but a team nonetheless. I call this “connected autonomy.”

(5) Strategic Internal Organization:Government is looking to the faith community for help in part because FBOs are often marked by a flexibility and informality that enables them to interact with families in a way that feels more personal and individually-tailored than “dealing with government bureaucracy.” And that is good. But the faith organizations must also maintain a sufficient level of organization and administrative sophistication that permits them to interact effectively with government. FBOs need to be excellent record-keepers; they must have financial accounting systems and procedures that are well-organized and above reproach; and they need to be able to document what they have done with the public funds--how staff has been spent, what goals have been achieved with the families served, and so forth.

 

 

[1] Amy L. Sherman and John Green, Fruitful Collaborations: A Survey of Government-Funded Faith-Based Programs in 15 States (Hudson Institute, 2002).

[2] Ibid.

 

Related Articles
Fruitful Collaborations: Survey of Government-Funded Faith-Based Programs in 15 States (Exec Sum)

Q&A on Legal Issues Involved in FBO-Government Partnerships

Due Diligence Tips


News
Conference Calendar
Forum
Find Others
Ask a Specialist

 

 

Dr. Amy ShermanTechMission UrbanMinistry.org and its partners provide sermons and talks by Dr. Amy Sherman. To purchase books and other media by Dr. Sherman visit www.centeronfic.org/v2/cficpublications/index.php.

MP3:      Podcast    RSS Feed

(Economis 1 is a pre-requisite session for Economis 2.)  This session provides a live demonstration of Economis, an interactive, online “mini-economy” you can use with youth to teach them financial life skills.  Economis is being used with students at Wheeler Mission’s community center as well as several other Christian after school programs and schools around the country.  Economis is suitable for all grades but especially works well with middle school students.  It offers an experiential way for youth to learn about personal money management, saving, and investing and also serves as outcome-tracking software for your youth ministry.


77:02 minutes (52.9 MB)

Dr. Amy Sherman: Biblical Foundations of Economic Literacy: CCDA 2006 Audio

CCDA's third "R" (Redistribution) refers to the economic empowerment and justice that can result from creative, accountable stewardship. The workshop explores the Biblical foundations of stewardship that brings economic transformation and gives an overview of the value and relevance of the ELE:VATE project for CCDA ministries.

 


77:46 minutes (53.41 MB)

 

      EVALUATION RESOURCE  

Using the MA Family Self-Sufficiency Scales and Ladders Assessment Form

 

by Amy L. Sherman (FASTEN, 2007)

 

Resource Type: article with guidance for churches and Christian ministries working with low-income families on how to apply/use/adapt this helpful assessment tool

 

Audience: Pastors and lay leaders wanting an excellent overview of the principles and practices of church-based holistic ministry

 

*************************** 

 

This group of assessment forms, though designed for use by social work professionals in the Massachusetts social welfare system, makes an excellent tool for faith-based groups to adapt and use in their work with low-income youth, adults, or families.

 

The forms cover several key life arenas, such as employment, education, transportation, health, family development, and housing, among others. Each offers indicators for five different levels of health/well-being, ranging from in-crisis to thriving. Each also breaks down the particular topic into subcategories, for a more nuanced and specific assessment. The employment form, for example, includes the subcategories employment type, wages, benefits, and skills/work history.

 

These assessment forms can be used in several ways.

 

First, they can be used in an initial interview with a program participant, in order to establish a baseline of where the person is at in terms of his/her condition in the different life arenas. This use would be helpful for a program director seeking initial funding for a program, as a way of accurately summarizing to potential grantors the life conditions of the potential program beneficiaries.

 

Second, they can be used as the foundation for an outcomes based program evaluation. In this scenario, program staff (or trained volunteers) would interview participants at the outset of the program and complete the appropriate forms (i.e., those that cover the life arenas affected by the program. An ESL program with no particular emphasis on job skills or job placement would not use the employment form, for example.) Then, at specified intervals (such as mid-way through the program and at its conclusion), participants would be re-interviewed and the forms again completed. Then the various forms would be analyzed to measure the participant?s level of improvement in the varying life arenas. Reports based on this analysis would then communicate the number and percentage of program participants who improved from one level to another on the ?ladders? in the different assessment arenas. The reports could also indicate group performance, such as: ?86% of program participants were found to be ?in crisis? or ?at-risk? in five life arenas at the outset of the program. At the program?s conclusion, only 32% of program participants remained in the ?at-risk? level and only 5% remained in the ?in crisis? level.?

 

Third, they can be used with program staff, simply to give them a vision of how to define progress in different arenas (what to be looking for) and help them to monitor and track participant progress by observation (even if a formal interview is not conducted with the program participant). Similarly, the forms could be shown to volunteers (such as mentors) working with program participants, to help them understand the variety of ways that the program is attempting to help the participant grow.

 

For the greatest accuracy, I recommend using these forms in a face-to-face meeting with program participants, using an interview format. That is, a staff person would frame questions using the wording on the forms as cues and then determine which box to check based on the participant?s response. For example, for the Employment Form, the staff person might ask:

 

(Employment Type): Are you currently working? Is that part-time or full-time? Is this a temporary or seasonable job? Is this job in a career field that is of interest to you?

 

(Wages): Considering the wages you make from the job(s) you?ve just told me about, would you say that your wages are

  • inadequate to meet your (and your family?s) basic expenses for food, clothing, and shelter?
  • adequate to meet your (and your family?s) basic expenses for food, clothing, and shelter ?
  • more than what you need to meet your (and your family?s) basic expenses for food, clothing, and shelter?

 

(Benefits): Do you receive any benefits through the employers you have told me about, such as health insurance or dental benefits? If you do not receive benefits, how do you meet your need for health care, dental care, and vision care?

 

(Skills/Work History): Tell me what you feel are your marketable job skills. Would you say that you have ?job mobility? ? that is, if you were to leave your current job, would you have the skills required to take on some other job that you might enjoy more? Do you feel that at your current employer you have an opportunity for job advancement? Let?s talk a little bit about your work history. Have you been more or less continually employed for the past 3-5 years? Have you experienced long periods (more than three months) of being unemployed? How often, if ever, have you been fired from a job?

 

If conducting face-to-face interviews with program participants in order to gather the information is not possible, you could consider creating a questionnaire, based on the indicators used in the forms, for program participants to complete on their own. This will require some time and effort, as the questionnaire will need to be carefully worded, written at a level understandable to participants who may have limited education or English skills, and organized in a user-friendly, easy-to-understand manner. To keep the questionnaire as short and simple as possible, it may be necessary to write it in such as a way as to reduce the number of levels of health (currently there are five levels on the ?ladders? and you may need to reduce that to two or three, such as ?in crisis,? ?safe? and ?stable?).

 

Related Articles
MA Family Self-Sufficiency Scales and Ladders Assessment Form

Mentoring Programs Toolkit: Equipping Your Organization for Effective Outreach

Related Books
What Every Church Member Should Know About Poverty



-->
News
Conference Calendar
Forum
Find Others
Ask a Specialist